I felt for a moment as if we were in dialogue. Here is my poem:
What skill
to hide under
such cover
as face masks
provide
and not let them
know our
identities
Camouflage
to hide and
to stalk
successfully
the
over-confident,
unwary,
gullible
Cover up
to hide tears,
grow
strong and build allies
for a
united front
when time
is ripe to act
Cover up
to expose
character,
to play more
than one
part, one gender,
one race,
ethnicity
and class,
to meet someone
To walk in
another’s
shoes,
path, obstacles
To satisfy
curi-
osity, to
expand
What skill
to wear the mask
for
survival, what skill
to take it
off for love —
pain both
ways, always pain —
And
gain—empathy and
control,
freedom and its
opposite—strategic
choices to be alive
And here is a bit of Parker Palmer's intro from his Facebook
wall:
"Don't
wear your heart on your sleeve." "Play your cards close to your
vest." "Don't make yourself vulnerable." Sadly, most of us learn
early on that it's not safe to be in the world as who we truly are, with what
we really value and believe.But when we live "masked," even
"armored" lives, the world pays a price.
Parker Palmer reminds
us that this price we pay is "at the heart" of his book Healing the Heart of Democracy. This book is support for anyone
trying to change their modus operandi in the world.
In the following poem, Paul Laurence Dunbar exposes his undivided self in this confirmation of living a divided life:
We wear the mask that grins and lies,
It hides our cheeks and shades our eyes,—
This debt we pay to human guile;
With torn and bleeding hearts we smile,
And mouth with myriad subtleties.
Why should the world be over-wise,
In counting all our tears and sighs?
Nay, let them only see us, while
We wear the mask.
We smile, but, O great Christ, our cries
To thee from tortured souls arise.
We sing, but oh the clay is vile
Beneath our feet, and long the mile;
But let the world dream otherwise,
We wear the mask!
Dunbar's context was the Harlem Renaissance, but his message transcends
time. Palmer's context is now. The closest I have come to undivided is in my back-stage life: rehearsal, classroom, home, journals and my relationship with God. Now I try to bring that space into my writing.
Where, when, are we safe? or at least safe enough?
Dunbar's context was the Harlem Renaissance, but his message transcends time. Palmer's context is now. The closest I have come to undivided is in my back-stage life: rehearsal, classroom, home, journals and my relationship with God. Now I try to bring that space into my writing.
Where, when, are we safe? or at least safe enough?
2 comments:
Excellent! Insanely interesting (which equals kind of confusing)!
What part of this is confusing? or what confusion does this raise?
Post a Comment